CLEVE.ARGUELLES dotcom Change. Struggle. Revolution!

9Feb/092

A Case of Need |MY|TWO|CENTS|

No Gravatar

a-case-of-need-michael-crichton-925054290sA medical thriller that will surely encompass the boundaries of science and art, the boundaries of Law and Medicine.

"Dr. Art Lee is jailed for performing an illegal abortion resulting in the death of a prominent physician's daughter. Dr. John Berry, Art's friend, knows Art is innocent and sets out to prove it. He encounters resistance and apathy from most people, but he tenaciously searches for the real abortionist to clear his friend's name."

Crichton wrote A Case of Need in 1968, under the pseudonym Jeffery Hudson. It combines the wit of John Grisham and Michael Palmer into one great book that somehow succeed to include moral fables and so, moral conclusions.

Art Lee tells us why he decided to conduct abortions, despite the knowledge that he was committing a criminal offence. A woman asked him for an abortion; when he refused, ‘she said she knew of a man in the North End who would do it for two hundred dollars. He had been a medical orderly in the Marines, or something.’ The prospect bothered Art all night:

‘I had a vision of her going to a smelly back room somewhere and meeting a leering little guy who would letch her and maybe even manage to kill her. I thought about my own wife and our year-old baby, and how happy it could all be. I thought about the amateur abortions I’d seen as an intern, when the girls came in bleeding and foaming at three in the morning. And let’s face it, I thought about the seats I’d had in college. Once with Betty, we sat around for six weeks waiting for her period. I knew perfectly well that anybody can get pregnant by accident. It’s not hard, and it shouldn’t be a crime …

‘By morning I had decided that the law was unfair. I had decided that a doctor could play God in a lot of crappy ways, but this was a good way. I had seen a patient in trouble and I had refused to help her when it was within my power. That was what bothered me – I had denied her treatment. It was just as bad as denying penicillin to a sick man, just as cruel and just as foolish.’

But Crichton was not only motivated by the humane pragmatics of legal versus illegal abortion. In one of the seven appendices to this short thriller, Crichton concisely summarises six main arguments for abortion, and their counter-arguments.

With unusual addition of geekish footnotes, A Case of Need will surely find its way in your heart, in your heart, and sometimes because of medical science jargons, in your brain.

4 out of 5. :)

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
28Jan/090

Timeline | MY | TWO | CENTS |

No Gravatar
Category: Books
Genre: Science Fiction & Fantasy
Author: Michael Crichton
n177372Quantum Physics.

No way. "Timeline" is not for the boring professors of physics, It's really a 14th-century action thriller that takes you on a roller coaster ride through medieval France. If you ain't a history buff, this particular book will add some sense to you. :) But if you are, then this book is certainly a good read to test your trivias.

Wait. The writer is Crichton? Yes. To prove that it is indeed one of Crichton's work, quantum physics was included and played a major role on the story (especially the ending).

The action scenes are excellent and authentic (read: do not read this while taking inside a public vehicle!). Crichton made a real research and did a good job finding truths about France and quantum physics as well.

It's a book that drives you full throttle to the very end, makes you think, and remember something along the way. (Sooth?) I'd say that, as books goes these days (read: twilight), this book is a real read indeed.

5 out of 5 :)

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
28Jan/091

Andromeda Strain | MY | TWO | CENTS

No Gravatar
Category: Books
Genre: Science Fiction & Fantasy
Author: Michael Crichton
the_andromeda_strain_michael_crichton_bookSuspenseful. Enjoyable. And Outdated. :)

"Andromeda Strain" defines the inclusion of novels in science fiction. Crichton is alarmingly being very hardcore. [ But from the POV of a man in 2009, he's nothing but a narrator. :) ]

I think Crichton is taking some masters in twisting real science into something terrifying and believably-unbelievable.If you've seen the movie, the book will not give you any surprises.

With bias. Haha. :) I'm a Crichton fan.

4 out of 5. :)

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
4Jan/090

Lost World |My|Two|Cents|

No Gravatar

51mpgn1e5vl-bo2204203200-pisitb-sticker-arrow-clicktopright35-76-aa240-sh20-ou01“I believe my argument is valid. It is entirely possible, even likely, that dinosaurs still exist.”

Lost World is the sequel of the very succesful literary and entertainment venture "Jurassic Park." After reading "Jurassic Park," I decided I should go ahead and read the sequel. I expected it to be nearly as good as the first or even better, but I was disapointed.

My first question lies in the ressurection of the chaos theorist Ian Malcolm. How could a person be napalmed in an island with dinasours and still be alive? If Michael Crichton just ran out of ideas about complexity theory and chaos theory that he left Ian Malcolm dead in the first book then after sometime got another idea and reintroduce the character to the second book then .. he is doing bad.

The second problem is that every single important person in The Lost World is some sort of certifiable genius. Malcolm's two tag-along kids are both gifted. Everyone who comes along is some form of expert of some field. The only people who aren't talented/gifted/smart are the regular folks, and they all end up being the bad guys of the book.The good guys are all geniuses, and the bad guys are all... not. And, naturally, the geniuses survive because they are geniuses, while the bad guys all die because they are not so smart. (Parehas ba kami ng utak ni Crichton? Will he burn non-geniuses? Haha. )

The last thing is that it lacks coherence in the plot. There's always just chasing and the the chased is just trying to find a way out of the island. He should have done something to make the plot more original and non jurassic park.

This is not Crichton. Smart words are not enough. Focus on the plot. The only mistake that he'd done is that while writing the book, he was just thinking on how the movie will turn out. Tsk.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
27Dec/081

Airframe |MY|TWO|CENTS|

No Gravatar

n1947-185x300I have always enjoyed novels written by Michael Crichton. His writing style is very captivating because he writes with technicality through block of thoughts and actions, inserts random raw data (which I love the most, it is very hard to understand raw data but it is self-satisfying afterwards that you can finally do a lecture about it) into his works to make the readers believe it is real, but just enough for you to stay.

Airframe was no exception for being very Crichton.

I can’t believe how Michael Crichton played with several issues. All things touch other issues. This issues includes internal labor management, corporate politics/players, local regulations, international problems and the role of media. This is something that you will read when you are bored.

Airframe is wonderful, that is without any doubt. And if not for the way Crichton moves through stories I would not be able to read this book with ease and with let up. It was never a problem. But at the end, Mr. Crichton showed his fossilized weakness, that his charcaters are not too shallow to have thought processes, that they don’t have any difference with computers and other machines, that they are binary simpletons who either know or don’t know, either understand or are stupid.
It should have been a quoteless book without this line: “Emotionally [engineers], they’re all 13 years old, stuck at the age just before boys stop playing with toys, because they’ve discovered girls. They’re all still playing with toys. They have poor social skills, dress badly – but they’re extremeley intelligent and well trained, and they are very arrogant in their way. Outsiders are definitely not allowed to play.”
I enjoyed reading Airframe every minute of it.

If you’re a Crichton fan, then this one is a real throw up.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
   
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

© 2009-2012 CleveArguelles dotcom All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright